Here are the eight cores before starting FLIGHT...
...and here they are with FLIGHT running.
FLIGHT certainly appears to make the most of all it can get...Perhaps that is why it is so smooth
About simFlight - simflight.com - simflight.de - simflight.fr - simflight.nl - simflight.pt - simflight.es - simflight.it - simflight.jp - simrussia.com - simMarket
1
Core i7 with FLIGHT...
Started by
petermcleland
, Aug 06 2012 02:05 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
petermcleland
-
- Members
-
- 2144 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationDartmouth, Devon
Posted 06 August 2012 - 02:05 PM
Here are the eight cores before starting FLIGHT...
...and here they are with FLIGHT running.
FLIGHT certainly appears to make the most of all it can get...Perhaps that is why it is so smooth
Regards,
http://www.petermcleland.com/
Updated 28/8/2007
My Channel
http://www.youtube.c...nd?feature=mhee
http://www.petermcleland.com/
Updated 28/8/2007
My Channel
http://www.youtube.c...nd?feature=mhee
#2
PT.Vohnsen
-
- Members
-
- 786 posts
Advanced Member
- LocationDenmark
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:22 AM
I got a much better experience, when i got my i7.
So i indeed do agree.
So i indeed do agree.
HAF X Full tower with 1200W Corsair ATX Gold
ROG Asus Maximus IV Sandy Bridge
i7 2600k 3,4 ~ 3,8Ghz with Zalman cooler
16Gb Vengeance 15250MB/s
2x2 TB HD, Writing at 185-200MB/s, 500GB for Windows 7 Ultimate
GTX580
GTX285 @ physx
27" 16:9 HD 1ms response
ROG Asus Maximus IV Sandy Bridge
i7 2600k 3,4 ~ 3,8Ghz with Zalman cooler
16Gb Vengeance 15250MB/s
2x2 TB HD, Writing at 185-200MB/s, 500GB for Windows 7 Ultimate
GTX580
GTX285 @ physx
27" 16:9 HD 1ms response
#3
Burkhard
-
- Moderators
-
- 13757 posts
Product Support
- LocationIn front of my computer
Posted 21 August 2012 - 01:08 PM
Isn't that the same picture for FSX, one core working and all the others showing synchronous patterns because they all calculate the same stuff to have the user feel it is a multi core application?
#4
poshwebdeveloper
-
- new Members
-
- 1 posts
Newbie
- LocationIndia
Posted 14 February 2013 - 10:31 AM
hi,
Very interesting. When FSX was released, the hardware of the day could barely run it adequately. Today, the hardware has gone far beyond the needs of the application, but the way FSX is coded does not permit the program to take full advantage of the resources of the machine. Obviously MSF is written to help itself to whatever resources the computer has to offer.
That is what L-M should be (and hopefully is) doing with P3D.
Very interesting. When FSX was released, the hardware of the day could barely run it adequately. Today, the hardware has gone far beyond the needs of the application, but the way FSX is coded does not permit the program to take full advantage of the resources of the machine. Obviously MSF is written to help itself to whatever resources the computer has to offer.
That is what L-M should be (and hopefully is) doing with P3D.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
