-
Posts
97 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Posts posted by andredragt
-
-
@EliGrimThanks for looking into it. (signs up for Flightware 😛 )
Also, thanks for all the great work, using Builder and Creator makes the game much more fun 🙂
- 1
-
Is it possible for the creator while using FR24-data to actualy use landed/departed times?
if I put the following in, the creator uses 50 as the landed time instead of 07 /// 50 being the scheduled time
5:50 AM BA32
Hong Kong (HKG)
British Airways B77W (G-STBB)
Landed 5:07 AM -
as said to me so many times :), can you upload the output_log
Two things to look for w/o output_log.
Are the airlines actaully assigned to a terminal,
and the old problem that if you load a schedule for a day, there may not be enough open gates to accept incoming planes.. which we can easily see in the output_log.
-
1 minute ago, winsaudi said:
I did the same and it gave me v27. Weird.
Try the Fremont Server. that's where I got it
-
1 minute ago, winsaudi said:
Did you download from BMT Micro or elsewhere?
I did have to fill in the blanks from the original mail, links didn't seem to work
- 1
-
-
RT seems to be updated
-
-
17 hours ago, MJKERR said:
Runway 27R departures -
It should be possible to send pairs of aircraft to each of A1, A2 and A3, a queue of two in each giving six aircraft in total
However the first aircraft to arrive then blocks all the routes, and subsequent arrivals queue behind, as a result there is one queueStrange... I seem to remember that they actually don't block each other, but I mostly send the heavies to A1 (and M4 short of M1) and the non heavies to A1 and A2, so it maybe happening with Heavies on A1 and A2
17 hours ago, MJKERR said:Runway 27L departures -
Similar as above the first aircraft to arrive at either N2E, N2W or N3 then blocks the routesThey block taxiway Alpha (as I mentioned somewhere). For N2W, N2E and N1 I just send planes to txw B by AB7 or K1
-
-
I don't want to go in a whole discussion about where planes take of, I have been looking at Heathrow today where they are actually using 09R, and then mostly from N11.
Fact is, Planes in game can't do that, because they first have to roll to N8 to commence T/O
-
Planes definately use full lenght (your pic has one lining up)
Interesting read : Runway uses on Heathrow
- 1
-
Taxiway S and A13 seem a little bit to long.. or the runways to short.
This basically means that lining up will take some time
-
-
10 hours ago, argus99 said:
I hope it is not to impudent to ask, if you could add FAOR and KEWR to the airport list.
Methinks you should read the FAQ on the builderpage... they both don't spell EHAM 😛
- 1
-
So..even after sooo many hours... I still get surprised sometimes... a plane disappeared well// just decided to turn of the transponder??
Not on ADIRS..but it is definitely there on Delta5
!12:50:35 alt: 0 takeoff: False/False/-2 t: T_GA9 r: 25R * EC-UIV => I try to go to terminal! EC-UIV
-
A Plane with command: LINE UP AND WAIT BEHIND NEXT LANDING AIRCRAFT, will start rolling onto the runway the moment the landing plane goes to STATE_LAND.
If you look down, 194 went to STATE_LAND at 27:04, and that is actually just before he touches down (there is a moment just for touching down where the option Go Around is no longer available). 8 seconds later 1400 starts rolling, and because there is almost no runup area to runway, 1400 is on the runway before 194 reaches Tango, probably just clipped the nose?
Quote17:21:24 * DAL194 => ADD HISTORY: DAL194: RUNWAY 9L CLEARED TO LAND DAL194
17:21:33 * DAL194 => ADD HISTORY: DAL194: VACATE RUNWAY LEFT ONTO TAXIWAY N DAL194
17:24:03 * DAL1400 => ADD HISTORY: DAL1400: RUNWAY 9L AT T VIA J T DAL1400
17:25:55 * DAL1400 => ADD HISTORY: DAL1400: RUNWAY 9L LINE UP AND WAIT BEHIND NEXT LANDING AIRCRAFT DAL1400
17:27:04 alt: 99 takeoff: False/False/-2 OWNER_TOWER r: 9L * DAL194 => STATE CHANGE from STATE_INCOMING to STATE_LAND
17:27:12 alt: 0 takeoff: False/False/-2 OWNER_TOWER r: 9L * DAL194 => Landing cnt on runway: 9L cnt: 10
17:27:12 alt: 0 takeoff: False/False/9 OWNER_GROUND r: 9L * DAL1400 => stop gate at: (-1765.6, 1826.4, 0.0) takeoffgate: (-1765.6, 1826.4, 0.0)
17:27:12 alt: 0 takeoff: False/False/9 OWNER_GROUND r: 9L * DAL1400 => Activate lineup from: 9 runwaycnt: 1017:27:23 * DAL194 => ADD HISTORY: Crash DAL194 - DAL1400. -1000 pts
-
well.. I don't think people like us will ever NOT call them Max
(especiallyconsidering that they still will be 7M8,7M9 and 7MX??)
-
-
I don't know if it is in a file we as customers can acces.
For LFPG, look up my schedule, there is a map provided with which gates are designed for which A/C, they are divided in Heavy, Normal and Prop afaik. Not sure about the 757, I think it is condidered a Wide Body in the game because it is designated as heavy..although some don't have the designation 752/H, so they maybe considered small bodies (needs some investigating 😜 }
To find out, make a schedule with only Heavy KLM (or any other airline) and only assign one Terminal to KLM. If it goes to that Terminal, it has heavy gates.. and will stop sending planes when the heavy terminals are full. If the Terminal can't handle Heavies... it will send the planes to random other Terminals
- 1
-
from wikipage about terminal 3:
However it was announced on 6 September 2012 that Terminal 3 would no longer be Emirates exclusive, as Emirates and Qantas had set up an extensive code sharing agreement. Qantas would be the second and only one of two airlines to fly in and out of Terminal 3. This deal also allows Qantas to use the A380 Dedicated Concourse A.[1] The terminal has 5 Airbus A380 gates at Concourse B, and 18 at Concourse A.[2] In December 2018, flydubai commenced flights from terminal 3 to selected destinations to facilitate transfers to/from Emirates.[3][4]
So I guess you can add quantas and flydubai to T3
- 1
-
CYVR, no problems sofar
fun seeing a BW A380 in canada 🙂
- 1
- 2
-
-
think so.. Sky Team Livery is also in game, KLM E175
Terminal Allocation
in ATC Simulators
Posted
There is some info in this and following posts about terminal priority (discussion was started in completely the wrong post :p)