Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums

FeelThere

Members
  • Content Count

    2,185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    89

Everything posted by FeelThere

  1. The plane was meant to be for P3D4 and we offered a free patch to make it work with P3D5. We are in talk with Aeroplane Heaven about a possible fix for this but it involves something bigger. We are aware of this issue and we are still discussing it. Thank you Vic
  2. FeelThere

    KSEA?

    Thank you for the heads up. Bluehost insisted there wasn't any issue with the hosting and it took us this long to prove them indeed there was some issue. Hopefully it's fixed now. Thank you for your patience Vic
  3. Riky, Correct. We are still investigating it with AH. Thanks Vic
  4. Tower!3D Pro is on sale now during the black friday event 🙂
  5. Please explain the situation and how one can duplicate the concern. for issues with the FMC this includes details about: route (airport SID routing STAR aiport), cruise altitude, aircraft dry weight (passenger and cargo load), and any non-default FMC settings programmed into the PERFORMANCE pages.
  6. Sure, please read our sticky topic, we are still waiting information from you.
  7. I'm glad you can see our effort and I appreciate your feedback. Best Vic
  8. Thank you. We plan to have a proper SDK for the next Tower version for sure 🙂 Thank you all for the feedback. Vic
  9. I think that would be unreasonable. There is no point for that and imagine a worldwide traffic where you need to add all reg codes. Thank you Vic
  10. That's a topic for another conversation 🙂 We needed your input about the schedule making at this time 🙂 Thank you everyone for the input, I hope you will like our new editor. Vic
  11. The new gate editor will allow you renaming any stands or gates. We are working on the SDKs already and even for ourselves it's amazing how far we can go by customizing it.
  12. Please let me rephrase my question. Would my proposal of the format would miss any options that you wish to use? So let me show you an example: We would have a BAW123/A320/BAWRETRO1 BAW234/B777/BAWSTANDARD and in the terminal file you could set it up this way: Terminal 1: BAWRETRO1 Terminal2: BAWSTANDARD Vic
  13. Sorry but it's highly unlikely. It would create more problems than solutions.
  14. I apologize Leo somehow I forgot to reply. At this point probably that would be the most logical choice to release ATCC at a limited price with an SDK and clearly indicate it this is an unsupported beta product. Right now we are pretty busy moving our website to a new platform and we plan to announce a new product later this year, but this is something that makes me think over and over again, so sometimes next year we will make the decision over ATCC. It's pretty much done, playable but the traffic is just sparse. The data we have is just not enough to make it an interesting game. The best thing would be to somehow integrate live traffic. We are keep thinking about it. Vic
  15. Let's not hijack this old topics, please. The purpose of this post was to help out customers months ago with a major discount. Thank you Vic
  16. Dear Folks, This IS the time 🙂 During the Tower!XX wishlist we received so many requests for changing the schedule editor. Currently we are thinking about something like this: type/callsign/subcolor It means you could set the type, the airline who flies it and a special livery. Would it be OK? Would it be useful for the regional airlines flying for many airlines? The subcolor could be a cargo livery as well. Please note the callsign would remain the same but you could add any number of liveries this way under the same airline. When you set up the terminal instead of assigning an airline you could assign any livery into any terminal (so you could create for example international or domestic "liveries" by copy paste and send them to domestic, international or cargo terminals) Please give us your input, this is the time when we can make changes. Please get your answer short and clean and with some examples. Thank you Vic
  17. Hi Shom, We already posted that the standard weather is a bit exaggerated in P3D so you need to dial it back for realism. Thank you Vic
  18. Yes it is. Since P3DX there are no 2d panels anymore.
  19. We already upoloaded to Simmarket. Vic
  20. Unfortunately we are not there yet to answer questions. We hope to announce the project officially in the not too distant future. The best way to get the news is by signing up to our newsletter (it's also a good idea because we sometimes run some exclusive newsletter only sales too).
  21. SP on Simmarket. This is our top priority now.
  22. We are testing a few solutions for this. @crbascott is right; this is a full screen application itself so we have to come up with something that works on single and multi monitors as well. We have something that will likely solve it but that feature is among the ones that we will try to keep secret for a while 🙂 Vic
  23. Is there anyone out there who could get us information regarding the paperless strip? Vic
  24. Dear Folks, We just released the SP2 for the EMB v3. Existing customers can download their plane using the same link they received during the purchase. If your link is blocked (most of the time it's caused by the anti fraud system) please contact BMT Micro and sort it out with them. 3rd party resellers will receive the new files in the upcoming days. Besides of many small issues the main topics to address by the SP are: -AT behaviour at speed constraints -VNAV descend speed problems -several visual bugs -P3D5 installer -note: the glass effect wont be installed for P3D5, you need to do that manually from A2A's website- Please leave this announcement without comments. Thank you Vic
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.