Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums

C2615

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by C2615

  1. On 9/12/2021 at 11:09 PM, preynolds said:

    OK, so it looks like there was nothing in SP3, is my presumption that it didn't exist in SP2 correct and so I can't fly an RNAV approach in this aircraft?

    You can fly with LNAV only minimum with V/S or FPV

  2. 19 hours ago, smokeywood said:

    Greetings,

    Thank you for the links to the manuals I just missed that on the product page.

    As to running the installer I do run it as admin as I do with all my exe files.

    The problem is that when I check the Nd folder I have the cycle info text file as

    well as cycle.json and nd.db3 files but when I load the plane it says the active

    airac is 1 June-30 June 19

     

    Thanks again

    Gene

     

    I had the same problem and reported to navigraph, they told me to use their FMC manager for update, that works for me... but can't believe they didn't fix it on manualy install side for about a year...

  3. Same as I reported on SP2,  when deceleration to a given speed, it'll allow speed drop like 5~10kts below the target speed

    My condition encountered with 175:

    1.When slowing down from 270 to 250, level flight at 12000', it allows speed dropped to 242

    2.When start descending from 12000' and 250 using FLCH, it allows speed dropped to 244

    3. When flaps down to 5, and slowing to VAPP at 135 on 3degree GP, it allows speed dropped to 130, this one is especially dangerus.

     

    While SP1 has issue with A/T kick in too soon when in bump air, at least it works well on this part in smooth air....

  4. I tried on 190 and it feels better than SP2, but still need quire some force on rotation when on flaps2 and UP3.0.

    Once lift off, it feels ok, just a little back pressure to keep on V2+10.

    So I might still move the main gear contact point in aircraft.cfg slightly forward.

     

    Still, the realword data  shows E190's green band is on 0.5DN to 3.5UP, compare to Feelthere's 0-5UP, and for a somewhat normal CG of 25%, the range should be around 0.5DN-1.0UP, rather than the normal trim around 3.0 on FT, you really only need trim up to 3 when at high weight and CG as forward as less than 10 MAC

  5. 17 hours ago, TomD said:

    I just tested the FPA button and knob on the MCP panel. I was able to get both to work using FSUIPC mouse macros. I used a pushbutton on my button box for the FPA mode selector, then created two other macros on the FPA knob by using the mouse wheel up for increase and down decrease. I bound the FPA knob increase and decrease macros to a rotary encoder. I was able to manipulate FPA just fine this way. I had to make sure the sim wasn't paused when creating the macro on the FPA knob with the mouse wheel to be recognized correctly. Hope that helps. 

    I'm not familiar with mouse macros, but judging from FSUIPC's doc it need a 2D panel or VS at stationary?

    I use VC with TrackIR, so it doesn't seems working to me

  6. Yeah, the trim, the too lagging A/T(instead the overreaction one in SP1) are 2 main issue I have and waited too long for a fix (Actually the Fuel Flow as well,  but I just edited it.)

    And I've tested their fix for asymmetry wingflex, but seems they aren't on hurry to push that out also...

  7. On 2/15/2021 at 10:40 AM, PbSO42 said:

    Hello
    I have all E-Jets v3 family and I am interesting in China flight. But unfortunately I didn't find any Chinese liveries. Is there any one of them ? For example, Tianjin Airlines livery (one of the world  major Embraer 190/195 operator) for FeelThere Embraer v3, or can anyone do it ?

    https://forum.inibuilds.com/files/file/249-mandarin-airlines-e190-v3-b-16828/

    Something close though....

  8. I'm on ASP3D (the one for both v4 and v5) version 7638 with P3Dv4.5, the radar works reasonable on Ejets.

    the only problem is it won't scale above 100 range, it won't scale down to fit the ND, just stay as it's 100nm show on even 1000nm ND.

  9.  

    9 hours ago, Matty260191 said:

    the flight dynamics have been adjusted but not released as they are working on it still the E190 takes off much better now and in general.

    Good to hear, but do it contain correct CoG and Trim setting for take-off now?

  10. I just got the new TCA throttle, for me to "feel right" on it's range for Boeings, I think I'll need about -6~ -8 of "Slope" on the fowared Response Curve.

    Also, on my one, the two lever are splited by quite some degree in the middle part of range (somewhere a little above where the CL detent be), so I'll need the Sync Pos to line them up.

    I Lined them up with "Sync Pos" first, then I added the Slope to Throttle1, it works good, but when I tried to change slope on Throttle2, it says it's been used by SyncPos.

    So I tried to use "Sync Pos",After the Throttle 1 have been sloped, but it turns out to be the throttle are only "Sync" to the non- sloped position of throttle1, making it unusable...

    If I manually slope both throttle to -6, it's just like unsynchronized, a little splite in the middle...

    Anyway to get around?

    1676768386_.png.2a284fb82b650bb74f2145cd206c654d.png

    2097386694_.png.e4eebbd6da842c857e077821d3925e3e.png

    1877795892_.thumb.png.90d72b1efbaf2c87766122ea38737bdc.png

    With Throttle 1 sloped to 6 and Throttle 2 "Synced"

     

     

    401624168_.thumb.png.91618c11927da458052326f63e6aa478.png

    This is both sloped to -6 (simular if both non-sloped and non-synced), asymmetric is introduced by hardware

  11. E175 added as I just purchased it with recent sell, same set as before edited in OP.

    175 is about 100kg short on TO weight for performance at same condition compare to 170, but given longer runway, it have more MTOW. And on short range, takes a little more fuel,but on longer range, it saves fuel.

    The LRC mach for E175 is dead on, unlike 170 and 190, I kind think feelther just use 175's LRC FMC for 170 as well ,not sure if it's ture on 195/190.....

    Still no E195 as lack of data then

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.