Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums
hexzed

Community Project - New Livery Requests for RC KSFO (San Francisco)

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, alaskaGuy2018 said:

how do I delete one of the posts then 

 

It doesn't matter now, just if you post any more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but all the planes now all say Alaska on them and Alaska has already said that eventually horizon will no longer be a brand of Alaska all those flights will all say as on them and not QX it was on the news a while back about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and on flightrader24 if you put in QXE no flights come up but if you put ASA horizon flights are listed with Alaska as the E75 or the DH4 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you look in this screen shot you can see that even the flight numbers now are listed as AS and not QX anymore the aircraft type are the DH8D And The E175 horizon is not a airline anymore it is all Alaska now.

Screenshot (32).png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, AirJamaica said:

With the custom schedule I use I've seen a Vir 330 arriving from EGLL.

Must be an old or fictitious custom schedule. But you can always try to find a different link that shows the VIR/A330 at KSFO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, alaskaGuy2018 said:

Looks like Horizon Air (QXE) to me, which is still very much alive and flying. https://www.alaskaair.com/content/about-us/history/horizon-air-history

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/QXE2269

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/QXE2111 (Plus the DH80 doesn't even fly to KSFO) 

Oh well, I'm sure @hexzed will do a good job filtering out appropriate requests for Gabor.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody, to clarify, the link to the livery must show that it has arrived or departed San Francisco recently.

If it does not have this then it cannot be included in this update, and must wait for the appropriate airport that the livery is related to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, alaskaGuy2018 said:

well technically your right but why then did they put Air France as having the B787X in LFPG when it came out 

I may be wrong air fence doesn't fly 78x do they 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't find that they do but it was put into the airport for Paris Charles De Gaulle when that airport came out, I have for that airport in the schedule for Air France and the Air France livery works on that aircraft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

913413306_WestJetBoeing737Max-8.thumb.png.57fa8d585578b3d4a5e458ea43577138.pngthis airline needs these jets to have WestJets new livery I know it has this new livery in Tower!3D Pro in the airport LFPG on the B789's for WestJet

WJA  WS   WESTJET   B737 

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/c-fwsv#21f56bd5

WJA    WS    WESTJET    B38M 

can't get any flight information for this at the moment as it is currently grounded until DEC 2019 but I know that WestJet flies this aircraft as it is in CYVR

WJA WS   WESTJET B738

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/ws1509#21ef85f8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Braf123456 said:

I may be wrong air fence doesn't fly 78x do they 

It was a preempt for Air France getting the 787-10, but then they swapped with the KLM A350's, so yes technically now it isn't correct. 

But what is done is done. Let's focus on San Fran here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, alaskaGuy2018 said:

Hey what about this airline 

WJA  WS   WESTJET   B737 

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/c-fwsv#21f56bd5

WJA    WS    WESTJET    B38M 

can't get any flight information for this at the moment as it is currently grounded until DEC 2019 but I know that WestJet flies this aircraft as it is in CYVR

WJA WS   WESTJET B738

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/ws1509#21ef85f8

So is your idea to throw things against the wall and hope they stick? You might want to read @hexzed's initial post and actually follow the rules including doing some homework first.

All the WestJet liveries you mention already exist in several RC packs. The goal of these projects since day one have been to add NEW liveries to RC ... not add existing liveries to an airport.   

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dude I was implying that there is a new livery for WestJet as it is on the B789 and I have looked at pictures of WestJet and the other aircraft that WestJet has, have the airlines new livery to, so I was saying that this airline should get the new livery on their jets to, you didn't have to be so rude when you said that you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, alaskaGuy2018 said:

dude I was implying that there is a new livery for WestJet as it is on the B789 and I have looked at pictures of WestJet and the other aircraft that WestJet has have this new livery to so I was saying that this airline should get the new livery on their jets to you didn't have to be so rude when you said that you know.

You didn’t mention a new livery at all, so how is someone supposed to know what you are implying?

But to be honest all your posts are always difficult to comprehend. Sentences with punctuation and capitalization would help immensely, especially to those where English might not be their first language. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, crbascott said:

You didn’t mention a new livery at all, so how is someone supposed to know what you are implying?

But to be honest all your posts are always difficult to comprehend. Sentences with punctuation and capitalization would help immensely, especially to those where English might not be their first language. 

Amen to the punctuation and capitalization. This is unreadable

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And THIS is how you have a robust, fact-based discussion.
Not worrying about whether you are going to possibly offend some snowflake.

If you have a constructive comment/criticism to make, then make it cogently, using reasonably short sentences, lay out the argument factually, and don't ever take offense if someone pushes back when they correctly perceive that you are not making sense.

In short, look at the 1st post of the thread, respect that person's wishes and post accordingly.

BLB (Peter)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.