Pete Dowson Posted March 29, 2020 Report Share Posted March 29, 2020 24 minutes ago, brianwhtn said: Flew Gatwick EGKK to MENARA INTL, MOROCCO GMMX (default scenery) So let me get this right. Are default GMMX taxiways wrong for you with: 1. your original MakeRunways, or 2. the new one without the command line option, or 3. the new one using the command line option. I ask this because I realised that I don't actually know which you were talking about. If more than one of those, please make that clear. I can check out the reason with GMMX easily enough, knowing which data to look at. I don't need you to send any files. But it won't be today ... maybe tomorrow (Monday). Thanks Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianwhtn Posted March 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2020 25 minutes ago, Pete Dowson said: So let me get this right. Are default GMMX taxiways wrong for you with: 1. your original MakeRunways, or 2. the new one without the command line option, or 3. the new one using the command line option. I ask this because I realised that I don't actually know which you were talking about. If more than one of those, please make that clear. I can check out the reason with GMMX easily enough, knowing which data to look at. I don't need you to send any files. But it won't be today ... maybe tomorrow (Monday). Thanks Pete No 3. gmmx no taxiways with new one v4.892 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Dowson Posted March 30, 2020 Report Share Posted March 30, 2020 So GMMX fails with the command line option set to make 4892 act like your old version? But GMMX is okay with the correct encoding (4891 or 4892 without the option)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Dowson Posted March 30, 2020 Report Share Posted March 30, 2020 Forget it. I've compared GMMX results with MakeRunways 4.840, 4.891, and 4.892 with the OLDNDRAW parameter. They are all completely identical. So if ProATC/X has a problem with GMMX then I'm afraid ithey need to fix it. I can't help. Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianwhtn Posted April 5, 2020 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2020 On 3/30/2020 at 1:35 PM, Pete Dowson said: Forget it. I've compared GMMX results with MakeRunways 4.840, 4.891, and 4.892 with the OLDNDRAW parameter. They are all completely identical. So if ProATC/X has a problem with GMMX then I'm afraid ithey need to fix it. I can't help. Pete Hi Pete, Thats fine. One of the devs over at proatcx is going to create a tool to fix the issue for Gatwick, hopefully it will also fix any other airports that have the same issue. Thank you for looking at this for me. I'll just carry on using V4.891 of makerwys. Kind regards Brian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Dowson Posted April 5, 2020 Report Share Posted April 5, 2020 3 hours ago, brianwhtn said: One of the devs over at proatcx is going to create a tool to fix the issue for Gatwick, hopefully it will also fix any other airports that have the same issue. The only ones I've come across arethe more recent ones by UK2000. There was no issue, no difference in the data, at GMMX as I said. Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now