George Galik

Sorry, can you be more specific on the location? I am looking through it all and I cannot see where your "clear" bit ends and the "geek" bit starts. you say "on the very next page" but I cannot see any clear page demarcation for anything. Can you identify the actual heading, words, or something to help? The "easy" section (i.e. no conditions) defines the format with: = ,,C, and similar. Is this not "Geek"? The start of the section on conditions is a little more abbreviated: n=CP(+j2,b2)j,b, .... n=CU(+j2,b2)j,b, ... n=CP(–j2,b2)j,b, ... n=CU(–j2,b2)j,b, ... but surely the "j" and "b" references here strongly (unambiguously?) suggest the same as the and or your "easy" bit? There is even an explanation just a little later: (+j2,b2) means that button b2 on joystick j2 must be pressed ("on") for the current button action (for j,b) to be obeyed. (–j2,b2) means that button b2 on joystick j2 must be released ("off") for the current button action (for j,b) to be obeyed. The j,b,part is the usual button parameter, for the action of the “current” button which is button b on joystick j. In other words, the meaning of each symbol used is defined, just as it was in the earlier part. Please tell me why one is "clear English" and the other is "Geek". Agreed, the business of using conditionals is going to be more complex than simple definitions of "button X means do Y", but surely you must expect that? This stuff has been like this for years and I've really not had such adverse comments as your in all that time. Folks who don't understand conditionals apparently don't need to use them (as in fact it turns out you don't). I am left bewildered and confused here. Please help. Regards, Pete Dear Pete, Again thanks for your response. The section I am referring to is Sequences, Combinations and Mixtures. At the end of this section it goes into Compound Button Conditions where the conditionals start. What we are talking about is "thought flow". When one is introduce to a topic in a written document, there is usually a description of the variables that will be used in the book. You familiarize yourself with the nomenclature and proceed to extract the knowledge that the author is trying to convey. Following the logic of a thought process with witch you are not familiar is very trying and requires a lot of attention. When formats or descriptions change you lose focus and more importantly you break the chain of logic that the author is trying to convey. Now you have to go back and establish a new line of thought to include the variables. This is like hitting a bump in the road with your automobile. To those skilled in the art this might sound trite, but to people not as skilled it becomes a major disturbance and you lose you line of thought. It's like reading a book full of acronyms; it drives me crazy. I am a pilot and have had a subscription to the Jeppesen Airways manuals for 35 years. They are full of acronyms and to this day I have to constantly refer to the glossary for some of them. Enough said about that. After our several communications, especially about the encoders, things cleared up. I have both encoders working on com #1 &2. Here's what worked:CP(+0,22)0,23,C1030,0 CU(+0,22)0,23,C1031,0. The only problem remaining is the double speed action CP(-0,22)0,23,C1030,0 CU(-0,22)0,23,C1031,0 When I add these two lines the frequency just goes up 1 unit on the first click and then down one unit on the second click. Any Ideas? Good chatting with you, Regards G Galik

Dear Pete, Thanks for your quick response. 1.I did purchase a simple twin output digital encoder and now that I understand how it works, I will program it directly out of FSIUPC. 2.How did I reach my interpretation of your instructions on Compound Button Conditions? On the previous pages of your instruction manual (Format of Button Definitions) you wrote this in English. You described the format in words (Entry Number, Action, etc.) Then you went on to give some excellent examples of key presses and described the action in english words. Very clear, understandable stuff. On the very next page you switched to geek. I read and reread that section several times and could never determine whether 1,1 was a joystick and button number: joystick number entered twice: or a button entered twice. In your last response to me you say"How did you arrive at that? What would those two button numbers mean on their own, with no joystick number?" This is the geek part. I don't have a clue what the relationship is between the numbers. If you had opened this section with an english format and examples as you did in the previous section, I could follow the format and examples without understanding their relationship to one another. All of these"symbols", CP(+1,1) etc. do not convey any logical meaning to me; even though they are written in English characters they convey geek logic. I hope this clears up some our misunderstanding. Thanks for listening to me. Regards G Galik

Sending increment/decrement controls? The encoder must be clicking on and off fast enough to send batches of controls, then. Each such control with do one inc and one dec, but if the arrive closer than about 400 mSecs apart FS's acceleration kicks in. Try it with a mouse -- hold the mouse on the + or - spots on the radio. Try the same with the +/- keys on the keyboard. Do the encoders click? Does one click equate to an on-off or and off-on, or does it do on-off-on or off-on-off? You may want to only program the "press" not both "press" and "release". Trurning it one click should give you one inc or one dec. For really smooth results, if you have local displays in your hardware, you really need to ignore the FS display entirely, turn to set the local hardware, then write the FS value directly when the local one hasn't changed for, say, half a second. Of course this pre-supposes you are programming your own hardware and linking to FSUIPC. Most of the professionally sold radio stacks would work this way. Otherwise, with no program to control this you have to turn the knobs fast to get close to where you want to be, then slow, single clicks, to set exactly. The same applies to all of the MCP values too of course. And what does that mean? What are you trying to do there? If I understood what you were doing maybe I could spot something? You appear to be making the operation of button 23 on joystick 22 conditional on button 22 on joystick 0. How do you get to joystick number 22? You also appear to want a different control sent when the button is released compared to when it is pressed. If this is true then your rotaries must behave completely differently to those that I've used. The ones I know about give "on-off-on-off-on-off ..." on one line turned clockwise, with a click for each change, and the same on another line (different button number) when turned anti-clockwise. I think you'll need to explain exactly how your rotaries work before we can go much further. Probably because there's no joystick number 22? I'm not sure where computer literacy comes into it. It's only all about joystick numbers, button numbers and control numbers, all of which are either known or easily found in tables. Regards, Pete[/quote Dear Pete Thanks for your response. I'm beginning to understand what you wrote. 1. In your instruction manual the paragraph "Compound Button Conditions" states "you can now program those two-phase type rotary switches etc." I understand this to mean that this refers to encoders. 2. The line "1=CP(+1.1)1,2 I interpreted as"line # CP(+joystick#,button #)button#1,Button#2..." apparently this is the wrong interpretation. I am using joystick 0, buttons #22 & #23. Since you used #'s 1&2 I did not know what was a joystick or button number. In your previous definitions you wrote the format out in words ,on these you did not. This is what I was referring to when I said I don't understand computereze. You folks take it for granted that everyone understands what is relative simple and straight forward to you. I understand "C" to be the third letter of the alphabet; for you it is a programming language. 3.All I want to do is turn an encoder knob and have it change the numbers on the computer screen. I hooked up two momentary push buttons and programmed them up and down and they work fine. I want to replace the switches with a rotating knob... that's all. Your program works great, but please keep in mind the simpletons like me that do not understand some of this stuff. Regards

What's the problem? I can't help in a vacuum. What don't you understand? What have you tried? Why do you want to use compound conditions? Surely if you are building a full panel you have rotary encoders for each radio, so normal direct programming should be fine. Pete Dear Pete, Thanks for your quick response. First I tried to program the encoder directly. It responded, however the numbers would not go up in sequence. They would jump up or down several digits. Then I went into theINI file and wrote"31=CP(+0,22)22,23,C65436; line 32=CU(+0,22)22,23,C65437 and that did not work. As a matter of fact there was no response at all.Obviously, I am missing something and since I am not computer literate I need help.

8/8/05 Hi flight Simmers I am building up a panel and have purchased encoders for the radios. I am using FSUIPC to program the encoders.. In Pete Dowsons Advanced Users Instuctions (ver3.47) in paragraph heading"Compound Button Conditions" he gives instructions for programming an encoder. I cannot get this to work. Iam programming buttons 23 & 24 on joystick 0. Please help George Galik