Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About kagazi

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1970

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  1. My TrafficCommercial.bgl definitely changes when I choose the No UT2 option, but not all airlines that should be removed are removed. The two that I've been testing are United and South West. This is new to 6.0a. I have full control over the MyTraffic folder which is located on a separate drive dedicated to FSX. I've had the same set up for several years. The only thing that changed is the OS from 7 to 10. This is the first time I'm experiencing this issue. The only way to correct the problem is to change the slider to zero which removes all MTX airlines.
  2. Beta 5: When I create all files and traffic using the flight plan editor and I check the No UT2 option, the schedules produced do not honor this request. For example, I continue to see United Continental and Southwest Airlines although when I go to manage and edit both indicate that they are in UT2. Maybe this option has been disabled? I'm using Acceleration on Win10 Home 64 bit.
  3. I'm sure it will work to some degree, the question I have is how well. If you use the FSX ATC and the changed/added waypoints/NAVAIDS are not correctly recognized by FSX, it will impact your flight and FSX ATC instructions for landing as you enter into the control of the airport scenery. For example, KEIKI is a route waypoint that is used as the IAF for the ILS and RNAV Y approaches to Runway 2 at PHOG. Although FSX ATC recognizes KEIKI an includes the transition as an option if the user were not to select vectors to final but rather ask FSX ATC for an alternative approach, if you were t
  4. Read the disclaimer very carefully before installing the update navaid/waypoint bgl. First, it uses AIRAC data standard. FSX is built upon the ARINC 424 standard. So there will be discrepancies. Second, it does not correct all VOR/NDBs and does not remove old moved/decommissioned or renamed NAVAIDS including waypoints. This may result in duplicates or worse. It corrects some waypoints/intersections but what about the airways (route data) that show low (V) and high (J) routes between waypoints. I can't find anywhere where the data distinguishes between waypoint and terminal waypoints
  5. Another alternative would be for you to use an airport scenery design tool (google Airport Design Editor (ADE)) and with a few clicks you can make the change yourself. If it's one or two airports post them here and maybe someone can make the change for you.
  6. This website will help with adding third party scenery into FSX with Windows 7: www.fsnb.ca/fsxscenery.html
  7. Attached file based on FSX default. I modified parking to reflect airport terminal charts. I also revised the ILS @ Rwy 6 per the latest charts. The IF is FD06 (8,300 feet) and the FAF is CF06 (7,500 feet). The FAF is 2.8 NM further out from the NO NDB (6,630 feet). This was done as to avoid AI approaching from a westerly direction from slamming into the mountain range west of HKNW. A few other minor fixes and eye candy. To install simply add the two files to your MytrafficX scenery folder. Remember to remove or .passive the existing BR2_HKJK.bgl file. HKJK.rar
  8. A few observations: Stock FSX scenery: Most planes arriving from the west (approaching near HKNW direct to the NDB NO) had difficulty landing. I tested with both MytrafficX and UT2. AI planes do not use approaches. If an ILS exists, they will fly a pattern direct to the final approach fix at the altitude specified in the scenery approach header. In this case, the FAF is the terminal waypoint OM06. The approach altitude is 7,500 feet. The distance to the runway threshold is 3.9 NM. When approaching from the west, the turn to final is a hard left at 7,500 feet and the AI planes I observe
  9. You will find a BR2_HKJK.bgl file in the MyTraffic scenery folder. Locate the file and add passive to the end; e.g., BR2_HKJK.bgl.passive. Go into FSX and retest. Now you're using the FSX stock HKJK. If you're still seeing issues after 10 minutes - a few of the first landings due to where FSX spawns them may come in too high or too low - you can rule out the MyTrafficX modified HKJK scenery. Also, if you can list the plane types that have a hard time landing that would be helpful as well (I'm assuming that your observations are for the ILS landing on runway 6?).
  10. I can't locate an FSX stock HJKJ -- I did find an HKJK. Is this what you're referring to?
  11. If you want to guarantee your user plane a spot at a specific gate (99.9% guarantee) you'll need to follow a guide which can be downloaded at flightsim called VIP_FSX.zip. Otherwise the parking spot that FSX assigns the user plane when it lands on the runway (confirmed once you cross the first hold short) depends on a score. The weighted score as I understand it depends on radius, parking type, airline parking code and distance from the runway. If you land at an airport and there are a few "unoccupied" gates with jetways, you may still be assigned to a gate without a jetway based on the wei
  12. Let me know if this works. Needed to move space 15. Changed its location and made it 26m spot. Changed another 26m to 36m to maintain consistency. BR2_YSRI.rar
  13. Wally - when you crashed at klax were you using 2012 or 2013 schedules? I tested klax at 19:30 local time using 50% and 2012 and all is fine. I'm using Win7x64.
  14. kagazi

    FAJS to FAOR

    I've created the dummy FAJS and the new FAOR. I have not modified the stock FAJS/FAOR so I may take a look at the existing BR2 version of FAJS to see what has bee added/changed. I also added FAOR and removed FAJS from the editor after dumping airports. I then ran the create schedules files and traffic, which took quite some time. I then googled airlines based in South Africa and used the list to bring up the MTX planes using the editor and manage airlines so as to change the FAJS hub to FAOR, where appropriate. I then ran create all files and traffic. I tested the airport and planes seem t
  15. This will depend on a few factors. First, I hope your new processor is a "k" version. This will allow you to overclock beyond the intel turbo boost. From my experience, the I7 2600K can be easily overclocked with a simple change to the turbo multiplier within the bios up to 4.1Ghz. Everything else stock. This is why you should not pay to have an overclock since most will only get you 4.1 - it's like ordering spaghetti and meat balls at a fancy Italian restaurant. Why pay extra for something you can easily do yourself? 12 GB of ram is over-kill for FSX and most other games. If you're not usi
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.