brianwhtn

Thank you for the latest update, however still the same results. Cannot render error (as file is being used by another process). Flight recording is just a stutterfest. Double checked that all program requisites have been installed. DirectX, Microsoft VisualStudio 2008 C++ redist and x2264vfw. Installed all programs as admin, checked all folders have admin rights for users, ran program as admin as well. Tried full screen mode, tried windowed mode, shut down all other running programs, disabled secondary screen, only tried on a default aircraft, still same result. If I was not, at sometime in the future, going to use it on MSFS I would now be asking for a refund, as it just does not play well with P3D 5.3 HF2 or at least my installation. I have looked back over the forum and this issue/bug was present in the previous version 4.5. I don't know whether other P3D users are having the same issue, or if they fixed it, and how? Brian

HI Fabio, I have double checked all that you have wrote here and I still receive the same error. unable to render as the file is being used by another service. Recording is fine, it just refuses to render anything, just get error and an empty *.mp4 file. Tried with both 3rd party aircraft and a default one. This driving me nuts now. Brian

HI Fabio, I purchased your program over the weekend to use on P3D V5.3 HF2, but I am having a couple of issues. I cannot seem to get the video rendering to work. I have followed the manual, but I keep getting the following error (File attached). The send error is when using pmdg 737 NGXu. The flight control replay program fails to record anything if I have 'record multiple items' ticked in the options menu. It works fine if that option is unticked. Is this a bug? Your help on these issues would be most appreciated. Thanks video_render_error.rtf

Hi Pete, Thats fine. One of the devs over at proatcx is going to create a tool to fix the issue for Gatwick, hopefully it will also fix any other airports that have the same issue. Thank you for looking at this for me. I'll just carry on using V4.891 of makerwys. Kind regards Brian

No 3. gmmx no taxiways with new one v4.892

Sure. Flew Gatwick EGKK to MENARA INTL, MOROCCO GMMX (default scenery) Brian

Hi Pete, Just thought I would update you on your makerwys switch option. It works well on the problem I was having, however it has produced a side affect in that other airports that were ok are now not. This was your suspition all along. I have been talking to a moderator over at proatcx, and at first he disagreed claiming my system was all wacked up, anyway so far I have given them all the evidence and followed everything that they asked me to do and still makerwys v4.891 (thats the one they asked me to use) gave errors, as you pointed out. Will let you know if I get it resolved. Thanks for help Brian

Ok Pete, Just tried fixed version and I can report that I now have my taxiways back using the switch. Do you want a copy of the runways.txt and the t5.csv files? brian

ok

Hi Pete, Downloaded and ran using the /OLDNODRAW switch exported to proatcx and still no go, proatcx still refusing to give me taxiroutes. I have sent link via private message with the new t5 and runways.txt for you to have a look at, but to be honest with you, I would not spend time on this too much as proatcx is not going to be updated anytime soon. I will revert to the older makerwys version as that works. Thanks for all your help. Kind regards Brian

Understood Pete, will let you know if all ok. Thanks again for your support.

Yes Pete I would like to try the new version. Thanks Brian

No need to be like that Pete, Was just asking for clarification.

Yes I have the addon program installed and now I am using the export option and the makerwys V4.8.4.0, as the newset makerwys version still gives the no taxi routes even using the export option. No I am not saying I have other addons that depend on the wrong classification, as I have not seen this error with others. But there must be differences with the latest version of makerwys, so was asking if I use the older version that works for me, is there any other side effects from not using the newer version. Brian

Thanks for the reply Pete. I don't think Proatcx is currently being updated since Morad had a nasty accident and now seems to have gone off the radar. It has been 18 months since proatx has had any updates, but I will enquire to see. I do not think you should revert to an earlier version. If I went with option 3 what does that mean for my other add-ons? The version that proatcx supplied does not use lorby app, which I assume will mean any add-ons using the new p3d add-on.cfg system would not be recognised. Option 2, again how would that fair with my other addons? Maybe i will run both! Anyway thank you for your quick response. Kind regards, Stay safe Brian