ITholic Posted July 4, 2017 Report Posted July 4, 2017 Dear Pete First thanks a lot for your continuous work on FSUIPC5. The updates are solving a lot of different issues for a lot of users. :-D In my case there is just one thing left. The offests up from 9000 (Reserved for future improvements) seem not to be implemented yet. CFY used them to assign the TQ functions f.e. for the trim. (x9093) Are these offsets on the agenda or will i have to change my script ? Kind regards Andi
Pete Dowson Posted July 4, 2017 Report Posted July 4, 2017 1 hour ago, ITholic said: CFY used them to assign the TQ functions f.e. for the trim. (x9093) Who are CFY? They should have applied to me for offsets to be assigned, so I could reserve them. there's no way I can avoid treading over these things, or allowing others to, if they do not get reserved space. 9000-93FF was allocated to Niko Kaan for Lekseecon, a program for the Level D 767 and 757 aircraft. Likewise 9400-953F have been allocated, and 9800-9FFF is all used for assorted FSUIPC facilities. There is some space i can allocate, but I need someone to apply for it. Pete
ITholic Posted July 4, 2017 Author Report Posted July 4, 2017 Thanks for your reply Pete. I don't think they would care at all because they already have newer versions of their TQs. CFY = Cockpitforyou. I have one of their first built TQ's running on an Opencockpits DCmotors card and a BU0836X joystick card. Are there any offset ranges reserved for user defined scripts so i can work on that old script ? Kind regards Andi
Pete Dowson Posted July 4, 2017 Report Posted July 4, 2017 51 minutes ago, ITholic said: Are there any offset ranges reserved for user defined scripts The documented user offsets are 66C0 to 66FF. Is that enough? Pete
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now