Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums

FeelThere

Members
  • Posts

    2,278
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    101

Everything posted by FeelThere

  1. That's a topic for another conversation 🙂 We needed your input about the schedule making at this time 🙂 Thank you everyone for the input, I hope you will like our new editor. Vic
  2. The new gate editor will allow you renaming any stands or gates. We are working on the SDKs already and even for ourselves it's amazing how far we can go by customizing it.
  3. Please let me rephrase my question. Would my proposal of the format would miss any options that you wish to use? So let me show you an example: We would have a BAW123/A320/BAWRETRO1 BAW234/B777/BAWSTANDARD and in the terminal file you could set it up this way: Terminal 1: BAWRETRO1 Terminal2: BAWSTANDARD Vic
  4. Sorry but it's highly unlikely. It would create more problems than solutions.
  5. I apologize Leo somehow I forgot to reply. At this point probably that would be the most logical choice to release ATCC at a limited price with an SDK and clearly indicate it this is an unsupported beta product. Right now we are pretty busy moving our website to a new platform and we plan to announce a new product later this year, but this is something that makes me think over and over again, so sometimes next year we will make the decision over ATCC. It's pretty much done, playable but the traffic is just sparse. The data we have is just not enough to make it an interesting game. The best thing would be to somehow integrate live traffic. We are keep thinking about it. Vic
  6. Let's not hijack this old topics, please. The purpose of this post was to help out customers months ago with a major discount. Thank you Vic
  7. Dear Folks, This IS the time 🙂 During the Tower!XX wishlist we received so many requests for changing the schedule editor. Currently we are thinking about something like this: type/callsign/subcolor It means you could set the type, the airline who flies it and a special livery. Would it be OK? Would it be useful for the regional airlines flying for many airlines? The subcolor could be a cargo livery as well. Please note the callsign would remain the same but you could add any number of liveries this way under the same airline. When you set up the terminal instead of assigning an airline you could assign any livery into any terminal (so you could create for example international or domestic "liveries" by copy paste and send them to domestic, international or cargo terminals) Please give us your input, this is the time when we can make changes. Please get your answer short and clean and with some examples. Thank you Vic
  8. Hi Shom, We already posted that the standard weather is a bit exaggerated in P3D so you need to dial it back for realism. Thank you Vic
  9. Yes it is. Since P3DX there are no 2d panels anymore.
  10. Unfortunately we are not there yet to answer questions. We hope to announce the project officially in the not too distant future. The best way to get the news is by signing up to our newsletter (it's also a good idea because we sometimes run some exclusive newsletter only sales too).
  11. SP on Simmarket. This is our top priority now.
  12. We are testing a few solutions for this. @crbascott is right; this is a full screen application itself so we have to come up with something that works on single and multi monitors as well. We have something that will likely solve it but that feature is among the ones that we will try to keep secret for a while 🙂 Vic
  13. Is there anyone out there who could get us information regarding the paperless strip? Vic
  14. I fully agree. For racing I used VR and now I could hardly race without VR (I really wish I would have time for that thought)... I tried VR for flying and while it was very close to the real thing, I couldn't keep flying that way for the reasons above; I had to find keyboard commands, my throttles, etc. So IF we add it for Tower I think I will be the first main tester and for surely (anyone, wink, wink) come up with some solution where you can keep the goggles on and no need to peak out to the keyboard. There are several things we keep hiding about the next Tower development but one of the major thing is to support such a hand free experiences. Interesting discussion, please keep it coming. Vic
  15. Interesting thoughts. I so wish I could post a screenshot of a current version (indeed our marketing team would remove me from my position for sure) 🙂 We are not there yet to let me comment resolution, etc, but VR is a very possible option. More and more simmers are using it and once you try it there is no return. Indeed it shouldn't make the non VR users less important so we will try to make both version as best as possible. Re: wish list. I think I posted it somewhere some statistic about the fact, majority of the requests made our list and most of them got high importance in our internal to-do list. Thank you so much Folks Vic
  16. Indeed it has an "actual ATC simulation" version however with a pricetag of an actual ATC simulator 🙂 However I see your point. We will try to make the new version scalable so lower end computers can hopefully run it. Vic
  17. Craig, do you have any reference that you suggest for the next version? Vic
  18. We have the following lined up: -FAOR (by Gabor) -KIAD -KEWR -EGLL -surprise airport 🙂 Thank you Vic
  19. Dear Folks, We would need a few existing customer who could test something for us on P3D5. Please PM me with your specs. Thank you Vic
  20. Thank you AlaskaGuy. Please see my reply above. Thank you Vic
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.