Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums

Emuteq Radio


Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I own an Emuteq radio NC165 which is an expensive replica of a real world Bendix king radio which worked flawlessly in FSX.

 

You have to start a seperate little module for it to connect using FSUIPC.

 

Unfortunately it doesn't work in Prepar3d v 2 and there is no xml file etc to view to see how it connects.

 

I have written several e mails to the manufacturer (Steve Masters I think) and not had a single reply.

 

As I mentioned this is not a cheap piece of add on kit and is really an excellent piece of equipment

 

Has anybody got one of these and have they managed to get it to work in Prepar3d 2 or found out how it connects to the sim.

 

Every time I try and connect I get the error  Run-Time error 9

 

                                                                   Sub Script out of range

 

Here's hoping with fingers crossed

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to start a seperate little module for it to connect using FSUIPC.

Unfortunately it doesn't work in Prepar3d v 2 and there is no xml file etc to view to see how it connects.

Dave

 

When you say "separate little module" do you mean a DLL which runs inside FS? If not, if it is an extenal EXE program which just talks to FSUIPC, then there shouldn't be a problem, really. The FSUIPC interface is the same.

 

Perhaps it doesn't like FSUIPC reporting a higher number in the offset which tells applications the version of FS. For ESP and P3D it will be higher than that for FSX. This could explain its "subscript out of range" problem if it was trying to use that number as an index. FSX was 8, ESP 9 and P3D 10 (in offset 3308).

 

Use FSUIPC's "ipc Read" logging and see if it tries to read this value and stops with the error shortly afterwards. Maybe we can fiddle something to fool it into thinking it's FSX.

 

Regards

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see any DLL it just appears to be a exe called Navcom

 

Dave

 

Okay. It was just terminology then. We tend to think of "modules" as DLLs, but EXE's as programs. When you said it was a module I naturally thought you meant a DLL, which did seem unlikely, as I suggested.

 

Regards

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.