Claude Troncy Posted March 30, 2019 Report Posted March 30, 2019 Bonjour Pete, May be your informed opinion could help me understand this: -Same computer -Two disk with the same OS windows 7, one for P3D stable, and the other for development and test. On one system the restart of P3D on the fly is very quick, on the other it is very long. I don't see any reason for that, so if you have an idea ? FSUIPC log Quick Load between 1966 and 1778 Quote 1513 Initialising SimConnect data requests now 1513 FSUIPC Menu entry added 1513 ... Using Prepar3D with Academic License 1513 \\FLIGHT1\Users\Troncy\AppData\Local\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v4\Prepar3D_Default.fxml 1513 \\FLIGHT1\Prepar3D v4\SimObjects\Airplanes\IRIS Raptor Driver\Raptor.air 1529 ### The user object is 'F-22 Raptor - 525th Fighter Squadron' 1529 ### Mode is NORMAL 1778 ### Mode: PAUSE on 1966 Loading Complete ... Long Load between 24008 and 1934 Quote 1528 Initialising SimConnect data requests now 1528 FSUIPC Menu entry added 1528 ... Using Prepar3D with Academic License 1544 \\FLIGHT1\Users\Troncy\AppData\Local\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v4\Prepar3D_Default.fxml 1544 \\FLIGHT1\C\Program Files\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v4\SimObjects\Airplanes\IRIS Raptor Driver\Raptor.air 1560 ### The user object is 'F-22 Raptor - 525th Fighter Squadron' 1560 ### Mode is NORMAL 1934 ### Mode: PAUSE on 24008 Loading Complete ... Merci Cheers Claude
Pete Dowson Posted March 30, 2019 Report Posted March 30, 2019 Sorry, I've no idea, but most likely to do with disk layout. Two disks? Exactly the same formatted, exactly the same content, installed in the same order, the same way? I'm convinced there can be enormous difference between freshly installed setups and ones which have existed a while and "grown". in my own case, for example, I have changed my main P3D4 PC. The older one was a 7900X running 4.8GHz on all of 10 cores, the new one a 9900K at 5.5GHz on all 8 cores. A lot faster, right? Also the memory is faster -- 280MHz on the old one 3600 MHz on the new one. So some things would be faster, of course. The disks are both Samsung Evo Pro SSD M.2 devices, the installed and enabled scenery is the same. The P3D settings are the same (well,actually a bit more ambitious in the new one). The add-on are the same. The scenario's in P3D are the same. The old one loads up at UK2000 to a "ready to flly" state in nearly 10 minutes. Yes -- 10 MINUTES. The new one takes 82 seconds. There's no way that the high CPU and memory clock speeds can account for that sort of improvement.. It just has to be the cleaner layout on disk. Pete
Claude Troncy Posted March 31, 2019 Author Report Posted March 31, 2019 Thanks Pete for your comments. Claude
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now