Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums

Pete Dowson

Moderators
  • Posts

    38,265
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    170

Everything posted by Pete Dowson

  1. Because the plan doesn't get as far as KLKV. Check it yourself. The last place it gets to is LMT. Also the plan you sent (the fcf file) is different to the PLN -- looks like you changed it or sent the wrong files. The PLN goes via KAGYE (?) not LMT. Either way, you certainly need to have both departure and arrival airports in the plan. Pete
  2. Yes, of course. You think I didn't think of that? :roll: You are very welcome to try to work the format out. When you have it all well decoded and documented please let me know. Regards, Pete
  3. FSUIPC has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with multiplayer. You've got something else going on there. Regards, Pete
  4. It certainly works okay with 8.5. Why weird? I can't get at the Jeppesen plans or data directly because it is encoded. I have two possibilities, one is trying to decode the graphics in the window when the flight plan is displayed (optical character recognition? Ugh!), or getting the data sent to the printer and intercepting it on the way. How would you do it then? Anyway, it isn't the printing of the "flight plan" (how do you do that?), but the Navigation Log-- the DOC is quite explicit. It says this: Not even the INI file? As the DOC says Well, you have a faulty FliteStar then, as those functions are nothing to do with FStarRC, but used by FliteStar to save the plans in its own formet. You need to report this to Jeppesen, because it isn't much use if you can save the plans, unless you always intend to fly new ones? Get back to me after you get FliteStar itself working correctly, if you still can't use FStarRC, but please be much more specific about exactly what you are doing. Vague terms like "print the plan" aren't sufficient, sorry. Regards, Pete
  5. Not arrived yet though. I'll check again later. Pete
  6. Hmm. As documented, you have to take care to use the same details for both. SimMarket will re-issue one or the other on request, but it might be easier to send the stuff to me. Send me both your orginal FSUIPC notification of Key email, and your WideFS one, and remind me which you want to prevail. Send to petedowson@btconnect.com. Regards, Pete
  7. What problem? The thread subject is only "OOPS", rather unhelpfully. Why not keep to the thread mentioning it, if there is one? I can't even find a recent thread by "Cubby". Maybe you posted to the wrong forum? Regards, Pete
  8. If the CH device is capable of sending multiple button values at the same time, yes. You use conditional programming, with flags for latching states if you like. But it isn't user-friendly. you have to do it by editing the FSUIPC.INI file. Everything you need to know is described in the Advanced User's Guide. Game port CH devices used a system of encoding each of up to 15 buttons into the 4 button lines on the game port. with those you cannot use a button for a shift whilst pushing another, as the state reflects only one of them at any time. With that type of connection you would have to use the flags in FSUIPC to latch different states according to the presses of your chosen selector button. Regards, Pete
  9. All FSUIPC does with these PM commands is toggle the bits in the offsets provided by PM for these controls. I think what happens then depends upon the version of PM modules and whether you have the PM MCP running. Up until recent builds the PM MCP used to handle all the ND bits in the offsets -- I think this changed recently, but to ascertain which builds are which you'll need to ask PM support. There are alternative PM controls you could try too (it seems almost everything in PM can be done in at least two ways!). If you look in the FSUIPC Advanced User's guide you'll find that the ND range INC and DEC commands are also supported (48 and 49) in the PM GC Controls offset. You can program any of those with buttons in FSUIPC -- find the GC Controls (by param) control and place the command number in the parameter field. Please make sure you are using the current FSUIPC in any case (3.30), and note that the new PFC driver (1.90) works better with 3.30. If you wish to verify that the buttons are operating the right bits in PM offsets, you can get the PM offsets documentation from the PM site, and monitor the locations themselves in FSUIPC using the monitor (see Logging page). Regards, Pete
  10. Well, it isn't a "Registry" code, its an access key. Entering this is part of registration. Please check the documentation supplied in the ZIP, which tells you precisely this in its early pages, or read the thread on this subject in the announcements in this Forum. Regards, Pete
  11. Ouch! Yes, you are correct, it is broken. That will teach me not to try to do so much when I can't even see properly! Looks like I broke it after the last Beta. Sorry. I'll try to fix it now and send you a version to test. Regards, Pete
  12. Wideclient is part of WideFS. If you install an updated WideFS this means installing both the Client and Server parts. If you only install part of it you (a) won't get any of the improvements or fixed included in that part, and )b) risk incompatibility between the two. So, yes, always install all parts when updating. If the flap switch is recognised by FSUIPC when you operate it, yes. Just assign it in the FSUIPC buttons page. I don't have a GF TQ unit to check it on I'm afraid. some units but that was a while ago. He must have forgotten). Regards, Pete
  13. Sorry, I don't know what AS2004 does now. If you look at the FSUIPC options and the smoothing is checked, then it is enabled. AS2004 can do that for you if it is programmed to do so. It cannot set the parameters though -- just adjust them to your liking if they are too slow or too fast. Pete
  14. It isn't so much FSUIPC being a different product, but SimMarket have their own system. Maybe you've never purchased from SimMarket before. It'll just be the way their system works. I doubt that they will want to rewrite their software but you can always suggest it to them. Regards, Pete
  15. No problem. I expect the SB problems will gradually be ironed out. It is still in Beta isn't it? Or hasn't it got to Beta stage yet? Regards, Pete
  16. Unless they are specifically checking for your registration, this actually is not possible. Are you sure that they don't mean "unregistered"? Otherwise it simply doesn't make any sense. When you register FSUIPC it doesn't then do any access checks on any program! This will not be anything to do with FSUIPC access keys, then. It seems you are getting confused between their licensing scheme for their software and the FSUIPC access system. Once you register FSUIPC as a user, no access keys from programs are even looked at. They become completely irrelevant. If it's some registration scheme in their program to make their program work, then they won't "fix" it because it probably isn't broken. It sounds to me that you have keys for their prgram but their documentation doesn't clearly tell you where to put them. They certainly won't be FSUIPC Keys at all. Contact me privately at petedowson@btconnect.com with all the details if you want further advice or confirmation on this Regards, Pete
  17. But they are different for different products. The receipt system is probably an automated generic system. With some things you order you would expect a box in the post several days later, with others there may be something later from the author. I think the fact that the DELIVERY method is spelled out clearly on the order page is sufficient, but if you feel otherwise by all means submit a complaint to SimMarket. They've been trading in this way for many products for a long time now and I would have thought they would have already heard from folks if it was a problem. Are they? I buy quite a lot of stuff on the Internet and rarely have I had instant returns of keys or anything. Some places only tell you that the author is notified and he should get back within 2 days or so. Regards, Pete
  18. Sorry, I don't follow. If you have registered FSUIPC as a personal copy then there shouldn't be a button to register an apppication. It isn't needed then. If that button is showing then you haven't registered FSUIPC as a user yet. Sorry, I do not understand what you are saying. If you have an unregistered FSUIPC and a freeware program and a Key to go with it, then please just follow the instructions and register it through the application registration button. If you have user-registered FSUIPC you need no other keys for any application. No, sorry. What for? Regards, Pete
  19. I think you'll find that it does explain on the site that the registration will be emailed to you within 24 hours. All you get automatically is a receipt. Humans have to process the order and dispatch the keys. You cannot expect them to be able to always respond immediately! Here's what it says very clearly and explicitly in the order page on SimMarket, right near the top: Surely that is clear. :roll: Regards, Pete
  20. Hmmm. Not sure why that should be. I don't think they use anything FSUIPC is involved in. I have had UT installed since it first came out and haven't noticed a problem with PalmSpotter, other than the time is usually wrong. Mnd you, that was with the original release, I've not used it for a while. Thank you! Regards, Pete
  21. Well, the Betas of 3.30 have been through a lot of testing on many systems over the past few weeks. I really cannot see any way that a change in the module could cause a crash in a completely unrelated part of FS. I'm sure it must be a conspiracy of coincidences. It is a matter of finding out what. It doesn't really necessarily follow. You'd have to get the same result with no FSUIPC applications -- it is of course possible that some incorrect behaviour from an application went unnoticed with ealrier versions, but as the offsets are gradually being used and allocated it is making an original problem show up. What FSUIPC applications are you runnig? Try without them, then add them one at a time. If you are not running anything that uses FSUIPC, then FSUIPC isn't really doing anything. If you are a registered user you could try removing your FSUIPC.KEY file, temporarily, and see if that changes anything. For then FSUIPC would truly be doing nothing without applications. If this does change it you could re-instate the KEY file and try changing one FSUIPC option at a time. But really I don't think it could be any of them. Well, if you have the time and patience some sort of process of elimination I've just mentioned would be useful. Thanks, Pete
  22. Hmmm. I get a spate of reports like this every single time I release a new version. I will be amazed on the first time I don't! :? Honestly, there's absolutely no changes in 3.30 which would have anything to do with this, all the new facilities and options are passive until used. Your problem is evidently just a result of a change in memory layouts -- either because of the ordering of modules in the FS Modules folder, or because of differences in memory usage between the versions. I have found the FS2004 GPS window to be precarious in a number of add-on situations, and I think there is some bug in FS which is quite difficult to pin down. There are a number of things you could try. First, move all your add-in modules out of the FS Modules folder (to any safe folder), then move them back one at a time, testing each time. When/if you get the error again, do the same but move them back in a different order. Et cetera. The other thing to be wary of is having a default flight loading with a complex panel. Try loading FS with one of the default panels initially then, when things are settled, load the complex one. Regards, Pete
  23. Yes, but that isn't the question. Have you been using WideFS 5.40 since February 2003, when it was released? When did you start getting problems? Why didn't you keep WideFS up to date -- it is after all quite likely that 5.41 was better, and 5.50 was better still? Now, 17 months later, it is too late for such free upgrades. Isn't this as before? As I said before, it does look like a problem limited to that PC. So do some eliminations. Try the MCP and CDU separately -- they are both quite heavy users of the network. Maybe you have the "NetDir" on a different PC? I think the NetDir is very often accessed by both modules, but I'm not sure. And, to check the hardware, try swapping bits around. I'm sure I've suggested all this before. Not necessarily, but, honestly, 5.40 was NOT optimised for TCP/IP and was, in fact, a transition version between a good IPX/SPX version (5.30) and a good TCP/IP version (5.50). I really cannot advise you on 5.40, It is too old and I do not remember!! (Haven't I already said this too?). Honestly, I am still completely confused as to how you are a NEW user but with 5.40. How can this be??? Really? I thought that was always optional. It depends on what sort of things you are running on the same PC. PLEASE READ THE WIDEFS.DOC. It does describe the use of these parameters. Oh dear. I am very sorry, but I cannot advise you any more. I have made suggestions that you try to determine what is wrong, by a process of elimination, especially whether it is hardware or not. I also advised you to update both FSUIPC and WideFS, but I am not going to tell you to spend money and expect solutions as a result, simply because I cannot possibly know what the problem is! I cannot guarantee anything, how do you expect me to? We are going in circles here. Please try to isolate the problem. If you want to buy new versions, please do so, but I cannot help with your hardware nor with PM, and I can only help advise you on results with current versions of my programs. I do keep saying all this, but I assume you do not understand my replies? Regards, Pete
  24. Glad you sorted it so quickly! Pete
  25. Try version 1.90, now available, without those parameters. Regards, Pete
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.