Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums

winsaudi

Members
  • Posts

    506
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Posts posted by winsaudi

  1. I am also confused.  The latest version that I have is "KJFK_for_Tower3D_Pro_SP1.exe" which I have had since March 2017. Thinking my version was out of date I have just downloaded it again with my BMT Micro link and lo and behold it is still "KJFK_for_Tower3D_Pro_SP1.exe".  

    So what is all this talk of version 3.0?

  2. RC KLAX was updated a couple of days ago to SP2v3, the ‘announcement’ was buried deep in another thread. I’m away from my PC for a week so I cannot tell you if the new version fixes the Lufthansa problem but you could find out in minutes.

  3. Air Jamaica,

    I quote a reply to a very similar question that you asked in another thread:

    "You will be able to download the new installer from the original download link what you received after the purchase.
    The new installer works with the original activation code."

    Why do you keep asking the same question?

  4. tim86,

    That's the one add-on I didn't get as I got the 3 RC packages separately, so a snapshot of my directories won't help.  However, the 'usual' cause of white aircraft is that the RC was installed to the wrong folder.  The smart installer (see the graphic posted August, 3 above) works as long as you select the correct option and your T3D is installed to its default option on your C: drive.  If you have installed T3D elsewhere you need to change the RC installation folder to match.

  5. acryingirl,

    A couple of points: 1) SP2 was released in May of last year, and has been superseded,  the current version is SP31d; 2) you will not find any links to SPs on this forum, you need to re-download with the links sent to you when you purchased T3D and each add-on. 

    So, depending on when you downloaded the main installation program, you may already have the latest version.

  6. On 1/30/2018 at 1:04 AM, nyergesdesign said:

    Dear Folks,

    we just released the Real Traffic SP6v4 for Tower!3D Pro

    What's fixed:
    - KLGA loading problem
    - TIST_terminal.txt

    Thank you,
    Gabor

    Air Jamaica,

    Please read the thread title and the first post by Gabor, Real Traffic has been updated to SP6v4 not T3DP.

  7. An interim quick fix is to edit the following 3 lines in the klas_schedule file:

    From:

    SBN, LAS, M83, G4,  401, 22:33, 12:00, 1, G4

    SBN, LAS, M83, G4, 9410, 20:47, 12:00, 1, G4

    LAS, SBN, M83, G4, 9406, 12:00, 14:37, 1, G4

    To:

    SBN, LAS, M80, G4,  401, 22:33, 12:00, 1, G4

    SBN, LAS, M80, G4, 9410, 20:47, 12:00, 1, G4

    LAS, SBN, M80, G4, 9406, 12:00, 14:37, 1, G4

    This will give pleasing visual results but I would still want ND to fix the issue properly as per my earlier post.

  8. Peabody/crbascott,

    Apologies, but my view of the real world took over and I didn't look at the RT package closely enough.  

    "MD-80" is not a specific aircraft, it is an umbrella series title covering MD-81, MD-82, MD-83, MD-87, and MD-88 aircraft types.  Allegiant have 32x MD-83 and 5x MD-88. So I mistakenly assumed the Allegiant aircraft at KLAS were MD-83, and only after looking closely at the RT schedule did I see that the majority are slated as "MD-80" and just 3 as "MD-83".  Sorry for the red herring. My screen grab above is of an MD-83 but in RT it is tagged as an MD-80.

    My view is that Nyerges Design should remove the incorrect MD-80 tags and replace them with appropriate MD-83 or MD-88 tags, in addition to fixing the missing/incorrect MD-83 baseline structure.  

    winsaudi out :)

  9. Vic,

    I'm not sure I agree with the 'half an hour idle' removal of aircraft. It is unrealistic because in RL the majority of aircraft are at gates for a turnround longer than 30 minutes.  How would this work if, for example, a BA 777 arrived at an airport and was due to depart 2 hours later? Would the arrived aircraft disappear after 30 minutes but there would be another BA 777 waiting at another gate as the outbound flight? That doesn't make sense to me or have I misunderstood your intentions?

    Wayne

  10. Welcome back Vic,

    At least we know the problem is recognized by FT and is being looked at. It appeared from an earlier FT post that some employees had no clue that the problem has been discussed a lot on this forum, investigated, reported, logs sent etc, etc.  Then someone deleted at least a couple of posts that dared to highlight the string of previous discussions on this matter!

    Wayne

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.