Jump to content
The simFlight Network Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by winsaudi

  1. An interim quick fix is to edit the following 3 lines in the klas_schedule file:


    SBN, LAS, M83, G4,  401, 22:33, 12:00, 1, G4

    SBN, LAS, M83, G4, 9410, 20:47, 12:00, 1, G4

    LAS, SBN, M83, G4, 9406, 12:00, 14:37, 1, G4


    SBN, LAS, M80, G4,  401, 22:33, 12:00, 1, G4

    SBN, LAS, M80, G4, 9410, 20:47, 12:00, 1, G4

    LAS, SBN, M80, G4, 9406, 12:00, 14:37, 1, G4

    This will give pleasing visual results but I would still want ND to fix the issue properly as per my earlier post.

  2. Peabody/crbascott,

    Apologies, but my view of the real world took over and I didn't look at the RT package closely enough.  

    "MD-80" is not a specific aircraft, it is an umbrella series title covering MD-81, MD-82, MD-83, MD-87, and MD-88 aircraft types.  Allegiant have 32x MD-83 and 5x MD-88. So I mistakenly assumed the Allegiant aircraft at KLAS were MD-83, and only after looking closely at the RT schedule did I see that the majority are slated as "MD-80" and just 3 as "MD-83".  Sorry for the red herring. My screen grab above is of an MD-83 but in RT it is tagged as an MD-80.

    My view is that Nyerges Design should remove the incorrect MD-80 tags and replace them with appropriate MD-83 or MD-88 tags, in addition to fixing the missing/incorrect MD-83 baseline structure.  

    winsaudi out :)

  3. Vic,

    I'm not sure I agree with the 'half an hour idle' removal of aircraft. It is unrealistic because in RL the majority of aircraft are at gates for a turnround longer than 30 minutes.  How would this work if, for example, a BA 777 arrived at an airport and was due to depart 2 hours later? Would the arrived aircraft disappear after 30 minutes but there would be another BA 777 waiting at another gate as the outbound flight? That doesn't make sense to me or have I misunderstood your intentions?


  4. Welcome back Vic,

    At least we know the problem is recognized by FT and is being looked at. It appeared from an earlier FT post that some employees had no clue that the problem has been discussed a lot on this forum, investigated, reported, logs sent etc, etc.  Then someone deleted at least a couple of posts that dared to highlight the string of previous discussions on this matter!


  5. “... after Xmas” Kev? You are generous, it is still a few days away and they are in time zones which give them a few more hours than you or me. 😂😂😂😂

    I do agree that Craig has done a great job, once again. His forensic examination of problem areas is fantastic and gives so much evidence for FT and ND to work with. So much better than the “voice recognition does not work, fix it now’ moans which are all too frequent on this forum. Fact based fault reporting such as Craig’s will benefit all of us when problems are fixed and SPs issued.


  6. Ripskin,

    If your original links were sent to you by BMT Micro, try cservice@bmtmicro.com.  I am sure there are other people there but both Seth & Barb have been brilliant helping me getting my download links live again.  They set the customer service bar very high for others to follow!

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. Guidelines Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.