B777ER Posted December 19, 2004 Report Posted December 19, 2004 Pete, I see that with the latest PFC.dll we can equalise close engine values for 2 engines. I have the PFC throttle quad that has the 4 throttles. While the 2 engine equalization works great now when I fly a two-engine jet (use the middle two throttles for two engine jets), when flying a 3 or 4 engine jet, it is very difficult to get the engine values the same. With the just released Dreamfleet 727 and the upcoming PMDG 744 and MD11, is there a way you can add a feature that will equalize close 3 and 4 engine values in a future update? Many thanks.
Pete Dowson Posted December 19, 2004 Report Posted December 19, 2004 With the just released Dreamfleet 727 and the upcoming PMDG 744 and MD11, is there a way you can add a feature that will equalize close 3 and 4 engine values in a future update? Many thanks. It is on my list. It's rather more complicated of course, and if not done carefully could give strange results. I think what I might do, rather than try to match all 3 or 4 engines, is match engines as follows: For 3 engines: only 1 and 3. Let 2 do what it wants. For 4 engines: 1 and 4, and 2 and 3, but separately. This would keep things balanced without the chance of it going haywire because one out of 3 or 4 is doing its own thing. I've been too busy with FSUIPC and WideFS to do much on the PFC driver in the last few months, but I place to look at it again in January. Regards, Pete
airforce2 Posted December 19, 2004 Report Posted December 19, 2004 Hi Pete; Along these lines, also an option to map one lever to throttles 1+3 would be helpful for 3-engined birds. Right now with a 2-throttle quad, you have to do 1+2 and 3. Cheers
Pete Dowson Posted December 19, 2004 Report Posted December 19, 2004 Along these lines, also an option to map one lever to throttles 1+3 would be helpful for 3-engined birds. Right now with a 2-throttle quad, you have to do 1+2 and 3. Hmmm. I don't see the point. What would be the use of a separate control for 2, losing the separate ones for 1 and 3? For differential thrust (assisting ground steering, and engine problems) you need separate control over 1 and 3, surely. This is why it is implemented that way. Next you'll be asking for 1+4 and 2+3 on a 4-engined aircraft! Uh? Regards, Pete
airforce2 Posted December 19, 2004 Report Posted December 19, 2004 Hi Pete; Actually, the takeoff thrust setting on the 727's center engine is always a tad higher than 1 & 3 because the bleeds are shut off on that engine. Use of asymmetric thrust to aid in ground handling on a jet with tail mounted engines isn't particularly useful. Anyway, absent abrnomal circumstances, having the two outboards slaved together and the center separated does make some sense. Cheers
B777ER Posted December 20, 2004 Author Report Posted December 20, 2004 For 3 engines: only 1 and 3. Let 2 do what it wants. For 4 engines: 1 and 4, and 2 and 3, but separately. This sounds good Pete. Looking forward to these.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now