MJKERR
-
Posts
478 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Posts posted by MJKERR
-
-
5 hours ago, EliGrim said:
tower3d.rec Mod and Voice Commands - Reference Card have been updated
3 new "old" commands were found by a wildcarded (<- that a word?) community member for you to use.
- LINE UP AND WAIT (w/o prefixing a runway, uses runway and path [if issued] from pushback command)
Does not work with EGLL, a departure runway has to be included
Assuming the test was a single runway
"Negative, callsign" -
2 hours ago, crbascott said:
Asked and answeredSadly it does not help me
If I need to upgrade my computer again it would take me about 6 months to do so (plus waiting for Windows XI)-
3
-
-
On 6/17/2021 at 8:43 PM, FeelThere said:
Finally we can officially announce Tower! Simulator 3, the next version of the Tower! franchise.
This may be helpful
I started with Tower 2011
However my computer would not run Tower 3D
I purchased a new computer to run Tower 3D
Could you please provide details for the minimum computer specification required?
This may be useful in advance for anyone with computer systems that would be border line or would not be able to operate the next version -
6 hours ago, DeltaVII said:
Go to Jetphotos.com, you'll find each of them, so you can pick the one you like best.
As per my original post, I am aware there were three liveries
I was having difficulty trying to match them to what was available in Tower 3D
Ironic, the latest version is correct, and more correct than the other two
I had hoped to include all three, but as the other two have livery errors there is no point including them
In EGLL the text for the logo looks blurred, but I suspect it is due to it being so thin-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Pedantic G said:
The most accurate would be the last one released in the EGLL RC pack.
Many thanks, version 32 looks the best
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, RayFH said:
If you are looking for accuracy, then consider that Virgin retired the A340-600, and no longer has any in the fleet.
My EGLL timetable is summer 2018, so the A340-600 was operational
I am just trying to work out which livery was correct at the time -
6 hours ago, hexzed said:
To me it looks like G-VFIT
This does not seem to match, as this livery is small script and blue stripe near the tail
-
6 hours ago, hexzed said:
To me it looks like G-VWIN
It looks like G-VWIN carried all three livery versions
-
7 hours ago, crbascott said:
why does it matter?
I was not aware of the different liveries on the Virgin Atlantic A340-600
-
Sadly does not confirm which aircraft was used
I have tried close up on EGLL, but one is blurred and the other has large italic logos-
2
-
-
Right click, properties
It also shows when loading in the bottom left
SP33 -
There are three different liveries on the Virgin Atlantic A340-600
-
I am trying to work out what aircraft the current Virgin Atlantic A340-600 was based on
-
40 minutes ago, Sky King said:
Is it possible to get larger pictures of the new version? At 4k on my system, they are quite small. I tried clicking on them but no larger version
It looks like Word Press is rescaling the images to 1024px width
Right click, open the image in a new tab
Edit the URL, remove the dimensionshttps://feelthere.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Tower_simulator_3.jpeg -
42 minutes ago, crbascott said:
The new version is supposed to have an editor so you should be able to create all the airports you want.
Oh no, unlimited DLC
I can see this opening a hornets nest and various versions of the same airport!
However that could be useful where an airport has changed over the years...
Equally, a fictional airport -
14 hours ago, crbascott said:
If the one airport was EGLL you'd be singing a different tune. 🤣
Not just EGLL, any UK airport...
I have still not seen any airports in the country where I live!-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, crbascott said:
Tower! Simulator 3
Needs more than one airport!
-
1
-
-
Hopefully...
Tower 2021
or
Tower 4K
or
Tower 3-
1
-
-
For anyone unfamiliar with real world operations this might help
Runway Designators (ARR = Arrival, DEP = Departure)
16L - DEP (No ARR)
16R - ARR and DEP
17L - ARR and DEP
17R - DEP (No ARR)
18 - ARR and DEP
34L - ARR and DEP
34R - DEP (No ARR)
35L - DEP (No ARR)
35R - ARR and DEP
36 - ARR and DEP-
1
-
-
16 hours ago, Avwriter said:
it also seemed to have a rather bleak appearance
I noticed this in the preview video
I then compared to recent photos and there is very little to see nearby other than fields and low shrubery -
Try these commands, see if any work...
ANA125, pushback approved, expect runway 25R
ANA125, pushback approved, expect runway 07L
ANA125, pushback approved, expect runway 25L
Once the aircraft has pushed back you can then direct it to the correct runway-
4
-
-
Runway 27R exits A1 , A2 and A3 still do not work
These are the primary departures from EGLL
This is RIDICULOUS!-
1
-
-
I would suggest uninstalling, and starting again
I would also suggest you install in the order
Tower 3D
EGLL
Real Traffic
When you process the downloaded file, right click and click on
Install as Administrator
On the desktop icons, right click the Properties and select the option
Run as Administrator -
On 3/29/2021 at 9:46 AM, Pedantic G said:
SPF1 Displaced Threshold Changes to Runway 09L & 09R - HIGH IMPACT
SPF2 Rename YA2 and Y1 to N11 and connect to start of Runway 09R - HIGH IMPACT
SPF3 RWY 27R at A10E Exit Point - HIGH IMPACT
SPF4 Move Hold Point on A3 to stop conflict - MEDIUM IMPACT
SPF5 Alpha Taxiway Hold Points onto 09L/27R and 09R/27L -HIGH IMPACT
SPF6 Add new link (SN1) between S1 and N1 - LOW IMPACT
SPF7 Pushback Fix on 5 gates onto Bravo correct release position - LOW IMPACT
SPF8 Tower/Ground speech feedback where some people hear "Detroit" - LOW IMPACT
SPF9 Check Calm Weather Settings - LOW IMPACTThe Runway 09 holding points look better, I will test later (although I have still not had suitable wind direction)
However Runway 27R holding points look the same
First test with Runway 27R operations (arrivals), departures from 27L
It is now possible to stack three aircraft at the N2 and N3 holding points, plus an aircraft can still pass on taxiway B
The pushbacks all look vastly better, no more unusual spinning, passing through terminal buildings or ready to taxi on the grass!
The missing name for Link 35 is a great help
The correction to Stand 313 is also a great help, just a shame Stand 357 could not be added
Tower!3D Pro Tools
in ATC Simulators
Posted
Tested again, same response aircraft has pushed back and requests Taxi Ready