EliGrim

If I'm not mistaken, you need REAL TRAFFIC first, to use REAL COLOR, but I'm not sure about that. REAL TRAFFIC is installed like the Airport AddOn. Path is: [..]\Tower 3D Pro REAL COLOR is installed the same way but uses the path: [..]\Tower 3D Pro\Extensions\Airplanes\Texturepacks

Are you sure, you used the correct installation path? For Windows: Click & Drag to mark/highlight the product registration key in the e-mail you've got and press [Crtl] + [C] to copy it to the clipboard Download and execute the installer (LEBL_for_Tower3D) Click on 'Next >' Agree with the terms and conditions (if you do so) and click 'Next >' The registration code should now be pre-filled. Type in your 'Name' ('Company' is optional), then click 'Next >' Click on the button with the 3 dots [...] and navigate to your 'Tower 3D Pro' folder. (If you use the Steam version it is: [path to programs or games directory]\Steam\steamapps\common\Tower 3D Pro - if it's not the Steam version, it could be: [path to programs or games directory]\Tower 3D Pro) Click on the 'Start' button After the installation you should find the 'LEBL' folder in '[..]\Tower 3D Pro\Extensions\Airfields'. Start the game as administrator and check if LEBL is shown in the games airport list.

I really don't understand how Multicore Next is solving this. But hey, if it works... 👍

I don't believe that it is. The problem is the Windows SmartScreen Filter message, probably due to a bad reputation of the new installers. So the question is: Why do the older files pass the SmartScreen Filter and the new ones not? You can ignore the warning, but why is there a warning at all?

First, I would check for Windows updates several times (only this time) and then uninstall and reinstall the graphics card driver. Since Microsoft started to misuse the users as testers, I meanwhile don't generally recommend checking for Windows updates manually anymore.

If I understand the SmartScreen Filter correctly, it will not actively scan for a virus or malware. Rather, the reputation of the file is compared with a database to detect potentially infected programs. If this is the case (I can be wrong, too), then the question arises: Why do the two installers have a bad reputation?

@nyergesdesign @FeelThere @FeelThere Ariel RT_Tower3D_PRO_sp6v11.exe does not pass the Windows 10 Defender SmartSceen Filter like all other downloads did. Why is that? Edit: Same with RC_Tower3D_LEBL.exe but no problems with previous RC installations.

It's perfect the way it is. Thank you very much.

Thanks for the informative clarification. I learn something new every day! 👍

This is what I've tested... tower3d.rec is: ... #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#runway2;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#runway2;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#runway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 ... Result: (RWY in 1st position) WORKS - If I say: "CALLSIGN, RWY XX, TAXI VIA, RWY_XY TWY_X TWY_Y TWY_Z", the plane find its way to "RWY_XY" and than taxi via the given RWY and TWYs. (RWY in 2nd position) DOESN'T WORK - If I say: "CALLSIGN, RWY XX, TAXI VIA, TWY_X RWY_XY TWY_Y TWY_Z", the game changes the order to "RWY_XY TWY_X TWY_Y TWY_Z" and the plane will or will not find its way and will or will not start to taxi. (RWY in 3rd position) DOESN'T WORK - If I say: "CALLSIGN, RWY XX, TAXI VIA, TWY_x TWY_Y RWY_XY TWY_Z", the game changes the order to "RWY_XY TWY_X TWY_Y TWY_Z", the pilot repeats the new order, but the plane will not start to taxi. If I delete the line: #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#runway2;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 and the new tower3d.rec is: ... #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#runway2;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#runway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 ... Result: (RWY in 1st position) DOESN'T WORK - If I say: "CALLSIGN, RWY XX, TAXI VIA, RWY_XY TWY_X TWY_Y TWY_Z", the game changes the order to "TWY_X RWY_XY TWY_Y TWY_Z", the pilot repeats the new order, but the plane will not start to taxi. (RWY in 2nd position) WORKS - If I say: "CALLSIGN, RWY XX, TAXI VIA, TWY_X RWY_XY TWY_Y TWY_Z", the plane is taxiing via "TWY_X", find its way to "RWY_XY" and than taxi via the given RWY and TWYs Y, Z, etc. (RWY in 3rd position) DOESN'T WORK - If I say: "CALLSIGN, RWY XX, TAXI VIA, TWY_x TWY_Y RWY_XY TWY_Z", the game changes the order to "TWY_X RWY_XY TWY_Y TWY_Z", the pilot repeats the new order, but the plane will not start to taxi. If I also delete the line: #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#runway2;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 and the new tower3d.rec is: ... #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#taxiway2;#runway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 ... Result: DOESN'T WORK - May work with specific combinations but it doesn't work at all in my tests on KLAX and KPHL for me. What I wanted to say in my previous post is that the line #airplane1; RUNWAY ;#runway1; TAXI VIA ;#taxiway1;#runway2;#taxiway2;#taxiway3;#taxiway4;#taxiway5;#taxiway6 in the tower3d.rec works for me. Then in the "TAXI VIA" command the runway must be in second position. But it gives you more control than having the runway in first position. Setting the runway to a deeper position, despite tower3d.rec entry, doesn't seem to work - at least not in my tests.

I don't know KATL, but maybe the rwy is too short or the wind comes from the wrong direction?

Yes, it's fictional. I've decided only doing fictional schedules. (At least for the moment!)

I've added the KPHL Schedule. So far I haven't been able to test every hour, so reports of anything strange are very welcome. This is of course true in principle and not only for KPHL.

So the moral is: Watch your mouth - you may not be able to take it back. Got it! 😉

Is it conceivable that the speech recognition detected a runway other than 27 and therefore FDX916 courageously threw itself in front of the arriving aircraft? EDIT: Just took a look at the screenshot... New thought: Is it possible that HOLD SHORT commands are only used for one (e.g. the right) side of the runway by the game and so the command "HOLD SHORT OF RWY 9" would have led to the goal?